Re: Singular soname bump and a review swap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Em sex., 11 de mar. de 2022 às 18:42, Jerry James
<loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
> HI Paulo,

  Hi Jerry,

> It's great to hear from you.  I hope you are well.

  Sorry for again taking a bit long to respond :( I have sagemath 9.5 built
locally for almost a month, but I will not interfere with your work right
now, and it is only in a somewhat hackish mode, it just builds :)

> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:42 AM Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   If nobody takes it, I can review.
>
> Ankur took it already.  On the other hand, he doesn't seem to have
> actually started the review yet...
>
> >   I was about to ask for a review as well, as I have my own version locally :)
>
> Ah, sorry, didn't mean to duplicate effort.
>
> >   Did not double check if already done, but will need to change L-function to
> > use the sage spkg as upstream is no longer available. This will also need a
> > library major downgrade. But only sagemath uses it, so not a major issue.
> > Optionally, could work on renaming  the L-function package to lcalc, to match
> > what it is being called in the past 6+ years...
>
> Yes, that's on the list.  This is what I had lined up to do next week
> sometime, after the python-primecountpy review is completed.
>
> - Update L-function to 2.0.5.  I did not notice that this changes the
> L-function soname downwards.  Ugh.  Still, as you say, that should be
> okay since sagemath is the only consumer.  I had added a comment at
> the top of the spec file noting that we should rename it "lcalc". :-)
> - Update python-cysignals to 1.11.2
> - Update Singular to 4.2.1p3
> - Update sympy to 1.10
> - Add python-primecountpy 0.1.0
> - Rebuild polymake due to the Singular update
> - Rebuild python-pysingular due to the Singular update
> - Update sagemath to 9.5
> - Retire pynac, which has been absorbed into sagemath
>
> Is there any of that you would prefer to do yourself?  I don't want to
> step on your toes at all.  Or if you would like to see the changes I'm
> planning to make to any of those packages, I'm happy to share the spec
> files and relevant patches with you.

  Feel free to send me a message if you want me to do some of
the tasks, otherwise you can do the full update.

> And then I'm going back to trying to retire from tending mathematical
> packages in Fedora.  If you want any of the packages I currently
> maintain, let me know and I will transfer them to you.  Regards,

  Sure, no problems :)

> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/

Thanks!
Paulo
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux