Re: F37 Change: Drop i686 builds of jdk8,11,17 and latest (18) rpms from f37 onwards (System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:31 AM Jiri Vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> You have valid points.
> The non transitive list is indeed not somehow immense[1]. Will add it to wiki page. Will also provide few recursive iterations. Ty for reminder.
> As for the  java-arches macro, I have no objections to it. It is PR to jpackages-tools? But maybe one note against - it may cause inconsistency, if somebody will decide to maintain another version of java - eg as now happens for jdk8 aarch32

Thank you for including the list of non-noarch Java packages.
However, *all* Java packages will need to be adapted to have
"ExcludeArch: i686", even the noarch packages (which will need
something like: "ExclusiveArch: everything-except-i686 noarch").
Otherwise the noarch packages will randomly fail to build, if they are
assigned to a i686 builder.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux