On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:43 AM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
I didn't run and upgrade/update first but I don't think it would affect this problem:
Problem 1: lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 has inferior architecture
- lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686
Problem 2: package openrgb-0.6-1.fc34.x86_64 requires libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package openrgb-0.6-1.fc34.x86_64 requires libmbedtls.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package openrgb-0.6-1.fc34.x86_64 requires libmbedx509.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- mbedtls-2.16.12-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package openrgb-0.6-1.fc34.x86_64
The first problem is related to steam from RPM Fusion.
Second problem, looks like openrgb needs to be rebuilt?
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
