On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 10:44:28AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 07:40:15PM +0100, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > Took git years to migrate from SHA-1, and some others haven't even started. > > git is a good example showing that this won't be easy. The SHA-256 > object format is still marked as experimental and not the default. Unless I'm mistaken Git isn't using SHA1 in cryptographic signatures, it is using it directly for hashing. The proposal isn't banning all use of SHA1, just SHA-1 based signatures. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
