Re: Landing a larger-than-release change (distrusting SHA-1 signatures)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:40 PM Alexander Sosedkin <asosedkin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Good news is, RHEL-9 is gonna lead the way
> and thus will take a lot of the hits first.
> Fedora doesn't have to pioneer it.
> Bad news is, Fedora has to follow suit someday anyway,
> and this brings me to how does one land such a change.

Yes, and the change has already "broken"
COPR with c9s/epel9

Related bugzillas (and discussions):

   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059101
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059424

and the COPR (in progress) adjustment:

  https://pagure.io/copr/copr/issue/2106


Gary
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux