Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 3:05 PM Robbie Harwood <rharwood@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > For example, as far as I know, you need the 32-bit host libraries for >> > running 32-bit Windows applications in Wine. Dropping that would make >> > our Wine packages almost useless, since a large fraction of Windows >> > software still isn't 64-bit. >> >> Would it be possible to have package foo's x86_64 build produce a >> foo.i686.rpm, or even just a foo-32.x86_64.rpm for this? Wine is an >> important use case, but keeping the whole arch machinery around for it >> seems like overkill - just having the packages that are relevant for it >> build 32-bit variants as a special case seems a lot cleaner. >> > > Koji normally filters out foreign arches from buildroot repos. There > are ways around it, but none are usable in Fedora Koji. Good to know. Guess it'd have to be things like foo-32.x86_64.rpm then. Be well, --Robbie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
