Re: Orphaning deltarpm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/6/22 10:29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I have always disliked deltarpms. They expand the size of the
frequently downloaded metadata with little overall benefit.


Wasn't Jonathan's point that the benefit is "little" because of infrastructure issues?

I remember in the early days of deltarpm, it would frequently reduce the download size on my systems by 70-90%.  I know that some people disliked that it made updates slower, but I always thought that reducing the bandwidth costs at our mirrors was a laudable goal.  Good stewardship of resources, and all of that.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux