Aside from the other follow-ups about whether or not to use them... here's an example of a SPEC I wrote for a proposed package:
not all are concerned with building according to Fedora Packaging standards, for proposal in inclusion some of us use forgemeta because it provides capability that allows us to build what/when we require with capabilities approaching Opensuse's OBS. in any case, more flexible than not. particularly the nice git branch support; incredibly useful, imo. here's one of mine: https://pagure.io/pgnd/nginx-mainline/blob/main/f/nginx/nginx.spec used for my regular COPR builds. it would be ... unfortunate ... if forgemeta were to vanish. my $0.02 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
