Re: GNOME (and Cinnamon) issues in Rawhide: status report, including gnome-bluetooth soname issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 21:43 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Since the builds have been in a compose, we can't untag them from
> > Rawhide, we can only move forwards.
> 
> Why can we not make an exception to this stubborn policy in cases like this? 
> We did not have this rule a few years ago and things worked out just fine. 
> And these days, we have distro-sync, which should make the version going 
> backwards a non-issue.

AFAIK we've always had that rule. It's always been policy that we don't
untag once a build has been in a successful compose. I don't think this
changed "a few years ago", unless I'm misremembering.

Anyhow, things should be all fixed up now, at least I'm writing this
from the f36-gnome tag and nothing's exploded yet.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux