On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:50:55PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:01:39PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I did some quick'n'dirty statistics of how many ELF files successfully gained > > a .package.note section. > > > > packages: 28742, see [1] for the list (*) > > If you still have the packages checked out, would it be possible for > you to binary grep them to see which packages / files contain improper > build paths embedded? > > > [1] https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/f36-package-grep-4.txt $ rg -l --hidden -e '-Wl,\S*package_note\S*' f36 → https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/f36-package-grep-4.txt If you want some other patterns, I can do a grep tommorrow. > I was planning to do this myself but I'm not sure how to grep across > all binary packages in Fedora without a vast download. (Maybe I could > limit it to "likely" packages, but that's not obvious either.) $ du -s /var/tmp/f36 138736216 + another ~40 GB scratch space for rpms during installation. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
