man, 27.06.2005 kl. 14.20 skrev Alan Cox: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 08:06:13AM -0400, OmniUni wrote: > > called, it be closely developed with fedora core. Though Cobind seems neat, > > and I will probably try it, the combination of Nautilus+XFCE makes me > > somewhat nervous. I have used gnome-panel with KDE, and Kicker with XFCE, > > Nautilus + XFce works remarkably well and it gives you a desktop running > entirely on the same library set. > > > to Trademarks, perhaps we should take the *** Hat Linux (Audio Hat Linux? > > Various other *** Hat's already exist and are other people's marks btw (eg > Hard Hat) > > > GraphiHat Linux?) naming convention to show the connection w/o infringing > > upon trademarks. Just an idea. > > Personally I'm in favour of Fedora Light/Lite providing its a "light" Fedora > that has the same packages but different default set (ie its 100% compatible) > and that there is a community around it not just one persons view Yes - Fedora LT migth probably be OK? Would be practical if it wasn just "fedora-like", but really *was* fedora - just a different install set with different CD's - or even better, for fc5, when there should exist extras CD's: A new choice in Anaconda as with "desktop" "workstation" "server" etc. Now: Any hints for freeing up some memory on a 128 MB laptop without sacryfising to much functionality? Getting rid of SElinux perhaps? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
