V Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 04:06:27PM +0100, Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 4:01 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, but is is worth the effort? I could open a bunch of bugs, but
> > I don't want to do this if nobody wants to look at them anyway.
>
> You might be able to save yourself from downloading and installing all
> packages manually, by querying repository metadata for file providers:
>
> for package in repository:
> for file in package:
> for provider in whatprovides(file):
> if provider != package:
> print "Path {file} is provided by both {package} and
> {provider}."
>
> Though you'd probably get a bunch of false positives, for things like
> shared directory ownership. Not sure if you could filter that out
> somehow.
>
You have the tested package locally, so you know whether a file name is
a directory or not and omit the directories from testing. (There is still
a possibility of clashing a local direcotory and a remote file, but I guess
that will be close to zero.)
Of course a good test when it discovers a same-named file, before reporting an
error, it should also check whether the Conflicts has already been declared
(locally or remotely).
(And the test also needs to skip a previous version of the tested package :)
-- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
