Dave Love wrote on 2022/02/01 19:20:
Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxx> writes:
On 1/29/22 19:40, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Looks like "minusone" variable looking like constant value defined
in
fortran/test/tH5A_1_8.F90 needs PARAMETER attribute. Tried this diff:
```
diff --git a/hdf5.spec b/hdf5.spec
index 3b1d27b..2bac44d 100644
--- a/hdf5.spec
+++ b/hdf5.spec
@@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ autoreconf -f -i
# Modify low optimization level for gnu compilers
sed -e 's|-O -finline-functions|-O3 -finline-functions|g' -i
config/gnu-flags
+sed -i fortran/test/tH5A_1_8.F90 -e 's|INTEGER :: minusone|INTEGER,
PARAMETER :: minusone|'
+
%build
#Do out of tree builds
%global _configure ../configure
```
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82124997
Unfortunately ppc64le %check fails, looking like long double
related,
which I believe is related to recent gcc default change to
-mabi=ieeelongdouble on ppc64le,
however I don't know how to fix this.
Thank you! I've passed that on to upstream.
I'm no longer a language lawyer, but it looks to me as if it should be
reported as a GCC bug. Is there something in the standard which says
the code is invalid?
Well, the problem here is that the code itself now compiles, but the result after
execution of the binary seems wrong, so we have to narrow the code.
Then, out of curiosity, I tried debugging this, and indeed something seems wrong
with gcc here. Reporeted:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050569
Mamoru
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
