Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 03. 02. 22 16:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
> 
> I've just tried to build python-gssapi with notes enabled after krb5 was fixed 
> and it builds fine.
> 
> See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gssapi/pull-request/4

It looks like it's not the first time that krb5-config causes issues because it picks up state from the build env:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997021
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204646
https://krbdev.mit.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=8159

We had similar problems long ago with libpcap's own tool, before the project made available a pkg-config file, which is much simpler and nicer (and doesn't fall apart when cross-compiling). Is there any reason to keep using these specialized binaries over pkg-config these days? Or is it just a matter of doing the work to gradually switch over?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux