Re: java17 as system JDK in f36 in troubles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 11:08 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 03. 02. 22 16:53, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >>
> >> Tag in the older gcc into your side tag, do the rebuilds, untag it?
> >
> > I'm in favour of doing this as most strightforward solution.
> > I'm failing to judge all consequences.
>
> There are some obstacles. It might not be just gcc that needs tagging in. It's
> probably also annobin, but maybe others?
>
> I recommend trying scratch builds and tag other packages in until it works.
> When you reach more than a handful of packages that need to be downgraded this
> way, consider not doing it.
>
> The consequences will practically be the same as if you have done the Java
> rebuild before gcc was updated.

This might be a bit of a big hammer, but what about building with
--with-toolchain=clang instead of gcc?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux