On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 11:08 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 03. 02. 22 16:53, Jiri Vanek wrote: > >> > >> Tag in the older gcc into your side tag, do the rebuilds, untag it? > > > > I'm in favour of doing this as most strightforward solution. > > I'm failing to judge all consequences. > > There are some obstacles. It might not be just gcc that needs tagging in. It's > probably also annobin, but maybe others? > > I recommend trying scratch builds and tag other packages in until it works. > When you reach more than a handful of packages that need to be downgraded this > way, consider not doing it. > > The consequences will practically be the same as if you have done the Java > rebuild before gcc was updated. This might be a bit of a big hammer, but what about building with --with-toolchain=clang instead of gcc? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure