Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 14:58, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 12:36:01PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 21/01/2022 19:04, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > >Uninitialized variables are a big problem.
> >
> > Yes, but as a package maintainer, I don't want to deal with dozens
> > of crashes after this change.
> >
> > Such problems must be fixed by upstream developers, not by
> > volunteers [package maintainers].
> >
> > Most upstreams will close such bug reports with "Fedora specific
> > issue" reason, as it was with GLIB assertions. I've manually fixed
> > many of them in my packages.
>
> I'm curious here how you think programs could crash with the proposed
> changes.

Vitaly, it looks like you didn't respond to this. I'm also curious why
this change would lead to crashes. Are we missing something?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux