Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:26:58AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> something needing *pkexec*. Though from what we've found in this
> thread, it seems like at least GNOME and KDE definitely do still need
> it. I'm not enough of a domain expert to know if it's realistic to
> rewrite everything in GNOME and KDE that relies on pkexec to use a
> different mechanism.

I wouldn't call myself a domain expert on this, but ...
cc-remote-login-helper at least should be able to be updated. (It's making
dbus calls to systemd to enable sshd.)

Other stuff may be more like fundamentally replacing the whole app/tool.

I wonder if a first step might be to split out pkexec into a subpackage, and
then gradually remove requirements on it.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux