Re: dhcpd-pools failed rebuild

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> said:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 13:30:09 +0100
> Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 4:52 PM Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > dhcpd-pools builds for Rawhide (in mock from F35) for me on x86_64, but
> > > failed the mass rebuild on ppc64le with:
> > >
> > > In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:1032,
> > >                  from ./stdlib.h:36,
> > >                  from mktime.c:49:
> > > /usr/include/bits/stdlib-ldbl.h: In function '__LDBL_REDIR1_DECL':
> > > /usr/include/bits/stdlib-ldbl.h:35:1: error: expected declaration specifiers before '__LDBL_REDIR1_DECL'
> > >    35 | __LDBL_REDIR1_DECL (strtold_l, __strtoieee128_l)
> > >       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from mktime.c:44:
> > > ./stdlib.h:812:1: error: storage class specified for parameter '_gl_cxxalias_dummy'
> > >   812 | _GL_CXXALIASWARN (malloc);
> > >       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >  [and a whole lot more from there]
> > 
> > The fact that the error message mentions the IEEE long double type
> > should be suspicious.
> > The GCC 12 version that was used for the mass rebuild also switched
> > ABI for long double types on ppc64le.
> > So this error probably means that either one of your libraries has not
> > been successfully rebuilt for that ABI change yet, or your code is
> > doing something weird. :)
> 
> this is a problem with bundled gnulib, which isn't compatible with the
> local glibc :-( It's mixing gnulib and glibc headers ...
> 
> see eg. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045780

So looking through this, I see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PPC64LE_Float128_Transition

This change looks like it's been pending for a while, bumped back
multiple releases, and then landed without update?  It seems incorrect
that the scope is limited to a few packages as stated (and that a
rebuild is all that is needed).

The change page says "We fully expect to fix all packaging changes in
Fedora Rawhide first when everything is ready." - is there somebody that
can at least help me fix my failing package?

-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux