Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:51:54AM +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 11:34, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Another concrete proposal:
> >
> > Is there a way to scan all binary packages in Fedora to get either a
> > count or list of those packages that contain strings like
> > "-Wl,-dT,/builddir/".  This will give us numbers on how bad the
> > problem is.  I suspect it's quite widespread.
> >
> > Rich.
> 
> And another concrete proposal:
> 
> This is not reflected *at all* in the change proposal. Modify the
> change proposal to acknowledge this issue and discuss it. If changes
> are needed with respect to how things are done in other packages, then
> required modifications should be in the scope of the proposal owners.

This all came up in the mass rebuild, so it wasn't known at the time
the proposal was written. I'll add more information to the Change page.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux