Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 11:19, Iñaki Ucar <iucar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 10:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > I think this change should be reverted until a cleaner way can be
> > > found to implement it.
> > I'm all for making better, but please make concrete proposals.
>
> Here's a concrete proposal:
>
> - Copy %build_*flags to another private macro, let's say %_build_*flags.
> - Add there the stuff that is not valid once the current build
> finishes (e.g., the flag that this change adds).
> - Use that in %set_build_flags and leave %build_*flags as it was.

Or even better:

- Define a new set of build-specific build flags, let's say
%build_specific_*flags
- Add the stuff there.
- Add them to %set_build_flags along %build_*flags

-- 
Iñaki Úcar
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux