Am 25.01.22 um 21:22 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
If I assume correctlty that both python-augeas and python-boto3 are in RHEL
7,
yes.
this exception applies:
"""
>
The package exists in both Fedora and RHEL, but the packager wants to
ship it in EPEL under an alternative name (as required by EPEL policy) to
provide a subpackage that exists in Fedora but does not exist (or is not
shipped) in RHEL.
"""
Well, I'm not exactly sure. For python-boto3 I plan on shipping exactly the same
code as RHEL 7.
python-augeas might be a bit different as RHEL ships 0.5 but I'd like to use 1.1
as that version fixed many bugs.
I guess the exemption only applies when using the same source code as present in
RHEL, right?
I don't think this rule applies to python3-josepy, as python-josepy exists in
EPEL7, not RHEL7.
I was thinking about this exemption:
"""
The package is being created so that multiple versions of the same package
can coexist in the distribution (or coexist between EPEL and RHEL). The
package MUST be properly named according to the naming guidelines and MUST
NOT conflict with all other versions of the same package.
> """
We need a newer version of josepy which only supports Python 3. Given the
age/maturity of RHEL 7 I don't want to remove python2-josepy from EPEL 7 and
introduce a newer python3-josepy.
Thank you very much, Miro
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
