Re: Fedora Core LT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/24/05, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would just like to say that putting non-Core packages in it isn't
> necessarily a bad idea, you just can't call it "Fedora Core" anymore.

There is a large number of such 2 disk subsets that could be created
like this.  I'm pretty uncomfortable with opening the door to every
possible re-combination of Extras + Core simply because it can be
done. I'm pefectly willing to discuss such re-combinations that have a
specific aim in mind. In this case, I'm not sure the package
selections make sense for the stated task.
Isn't the first 2 disks of the Core set already designed to do a
default Desktop install?

-jef

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux