Re: FC4 kernel performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 09:49 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> On Ven 24 juin 2005 05:20, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
> >  However, the discussion was about
> > data lost resulting for unwanted intrusion into you system including
> > hackers, worms, viruses and that sort of thing.
> 
> Read again the thread.
> The discussion was about why your average user would ever need RAID,
> SE-Linux and other weird server options in his FC kernel.

And the point here is that SELinux isn't a "weird server option".  It's
just as important on a desktop box, because it helps contain even
successful attacks and limits their potential damage.

-- 
        Peter

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux