Re: FC4 kernel performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul A Houle wrote:

>    Disk-based backup ~is~ viable in various forms.  For instance,  it's
> quite practical to back up stuff disk to a USB 2.0 or Firewire drive, 
> and it will finish faster than paint dries.  I've found that network
> backup onto disks works too:  but anything that's marketed explictly as
> a product for backup seems to be a scam.

My favourite backup method is rsync'ing to an HD of
the same size, mounted on another server in a different
room.

This way I can run daily, unattended backups and be
reasonably protected against fire and robbery.

Today, hard disks are larger, faster, more affordable
and more reliable than tapes or other removable media.

If only I could use a compressed r/w filesystem for
the backup disk, I'd save a few bucks.  JFFS2 is
the only mature filesystem that can do that, but
it doesn't appear to be usable with very large
partitions.

-- 
  // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/  http://www.develer.com/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux