On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:16 PM Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022, at 6:05 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > The path "/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm" does look very out-of-place in > > non-image-based systems, so *if* we want to move the rpmdb to a place > > that's consistent across all our Editions, it should also be a > > location name that makes sense across all Editions. > > I don't think we should discount alignment with OpenSUSE. When they originally proposed /usr/lib/sysimage I started to write a bikeshed reply email (like many that have been posted here) around why /usr/share was a bit better but then I said to myself: "You know what? I don't care as long as we get it in /usr. Since they're driving the change, and there really isn't any technical compelling reason to do something else, it's fine." > > Also, proliferation of these paths has a cost; see e.g. https://github.com/openSUSE/libsolv/pull/386 > Though in practice *most* cases will be fine just chasing a symlink from /var/lib/rpm. Wait, I thought this change was about making the path consistent within Fedora variants? I understand that converging on the same path as OpenSUSE makes sense, but does that mean we should not consider if there's a better alternative? ... And the "sysimage" path makes even less sense to me in the OpenSUSE context, since they don't have an OSTree based variant at all (unless I am mistaken)? Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
