Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 7:53 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 7:53 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 3:39 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 8:58 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > (snip)
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > == Detailed Description ==
> > > > > === Current location ===
> > > > > <pre>/var/lib/rpm</pre>
> > > > >
> > > > > === New location ===
> > > > > <pre>/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm</pre>
> > > > >
> > > > > <code>/var/lib/rpm</code> will be a symlink pointing to
> > > > > <code>/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm</code>
> > > >
> > > > I did not find a mention of this in the thread or in the Change
> > > > proposal, so I'll ask:
> > > > How do you plan to handle the directory -> symlink replacement on upgrade?
> > > >
> > > > As far as I can tell, those always required special treatment via
> > > > %pretrans scriptlets or something, and even the method currently
> > > > recommended by the Packaging Guidelines seems to be broken due to the
> > > > way dnf / RPM verifies validity of transactions.
> > > >
> > > > Additionally, that "special" handling will probably need to stay in
> > > > the RPM package's .spec file for years, given that upgrades from
> > > > Fedora 34 to 36 will need to be supported.
> > > >
> > >
> > > This is documented in the Change:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr#Upgrade.2Fcompatibility_impact
> > >
> > > The part that's probably missing there is that the upgraded package
> > > will release ownership of /var/lib/rpm and own the
> > > /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm directory.
> > >
> > > The configuration will change in the upgrade, and then an rpmdb
> > > rebuild on reboot will finalize the transition, as rpmdb rebuilds are
> > > done by loading the rpmdb in memory, renaming the directory,
> > > recreating it, and re-initializing the database files from memory.
> > >
> > > This avoids the pitfalls you've described with the pretrans stuff.
> >
> > Oh, great. Looks like I'm ~tired~ and missed that this is in the
> > Change proposal after all ...
> > Thanks for confirming that you found a way to handle upgrades.
>
> I did a manual proof of concept with the pseudo-sequence in the change
> proposal on a Fedora Rawhide VM. And it did work, and continues to do
> both GNOME Software and dnf updates OK. This is a sample size of 1, so
> there's more work to do to make sure it can be done safely, using the
> rpm sqlite upgrade as a guide. But I can write up the steps I used, so
> that anyone can test before we have it wired up.
>
> We have considered not applying the change to upgrades. Strictly
> speaking the release criterion say we only support upgrades from
> *clean installs* of the current two releases. But in practice quite a
> lot of users depend on reliable upgrades for *many* releases, and they
> get mad when things break even when it's been 10+ releases since they
> did a clean install. And also, Workstation edition PRD  "upgrade
> process should give a result that is the same as an original install".
> That is a tall order, but so long as it's safe, it's probably better
> to apply this change to upgrades. If we run into issues or establish
> the risk is too high, it's not such a big deal to apply the change to
> only new clean installs.

I'm personally concerned that the RPM transactions may not be handled
atomically if the /var/lib/rpm/ is migrated in the midst of an RPM
update. I'm not personally sure if RPM and Berkeley DB will handle
that correctly if there's any issues with the migration, particularly
if /usr/ overflows in the process of other bulky updates such as
libreoffice. Part of my work involves looking for where multiple
things can go wrong at once.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux