Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 16:16 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> 
> I know that you said that the scripts are needed because of "magic stuff™"
> that the scripts do, but sorry, that's not a justification: *everything* that
> can be done using a shell script can also be reimplemented independently.
> Right now audit pulls in the whole initscripts stack, this should all be replaced
> by some small helper. (Maybe a separate binary, or a small shell script, or
> maybe something in auditctl…. I don't know because I don't know audit.)

As I understand the bug, it's not a question of whether the thing can
be done, but whether it can be known *who did it*. 
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux