On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 16:16 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I know that you said that the scripts are needed because of "magic stuff™" > that the scripts do, but sorry, that's not a justification: *everything* that > can be done using a shell script can also be reimplemented independently. > Right now audit pulls in the whole initscripts stack, this should all be replaced > by some small helper. (Maybe a separate binary, or a small shell script, or > maybe something in auditctl…. I don't know because I don't know audit.) As I understand the bug, it's not a question of whether the thing can be done, but whether it can be known *who did it*. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure