Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/29/21 09:59, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
The modern day case where /usr is read-only is inside a container and you put an overlay or using some sort of linking to /var which is read-write in case of reboots.


Right, that makes sense.


To me this is like saying 'move everything into /usr but because its volitile move it back into /var but in a sub-directory from where it was so you can keep an image running.' In this case, this doesn't sound like any savings and more of a headache of why did it corrupt this time.


But this doesn't.  Why would you need to move the rpmdb?  Users probably aren't installing rpm packages in containers at run time (particularly if /usr is read-only); installation typically happens when building the container image, at which point /usr isn't read-only.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux