On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 17:27 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > == Scope == > * Proposal owners: > ** Maintain the following patch sets for the Linux kernel, and > possibly have them accepted in the upstream kernel: > *** [//lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210409114313.4073-1-roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx/ > IMA execution policies] > *** [//lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210914163401.864635-1-roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx/ > DIGLIM basic features] > *** [//lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210915163145.1046505-1-roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx/ > DIGLIM advanced features] > *** [//lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210930115533.878169-1-roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx/ > DIGLIM integration with IMA] > *** [//lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20181112102423.30415-1-roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx/ > PGP keys and signatures] For me this seems like kind of a non-starter unless these are merged upstream. I do not think it makes sense for Fedora to carry these patches downstream long-term. If this is a good implementation of a good feature, it should be merged upstream. If it isn't, we shouldn't carry it downstream. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
