Re: glibc-2.34.9000-33.fc36 untagged causing lots of dependency breakage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 09:54:39AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Hello:
> 
> Looks like glibc-2.34.9000-33.fc36 was tagged into f36 buildroot on 2021-12-18,
> but very recently untagged from f36 buildroot.
> Many binary rpms rebuilt recently have "Requires: glibc >= 2.34.9000-33.fc36"
> ( for example firefox has: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=28655956 )
> and not looks like lots of packages cause dependency breakage, e.g.
> 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80543777
> 
> Is this intentional?

Yes, I untagged it. I am trying to get a rawhide comppose to work. ;( 

I guess I can tag it back... that requires is... unfortunate. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux