Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bpepple

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 01:32:14PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> 
> > > Does anyone know how to contact them?  Direct email and bug reports have
> > > had no response.
> > 
> > His twitter profile points at a few contact options as a last resort.
> > https://twitter.com/bpepple
> 
> Sorry, I don't use Twitter.  If someone wants to reach out via Twitter that
> would be appreciated.
> 
I reached out via Twitter and this is the response:

"""
Hey Michel! I haven't really been involved in Fedora for awhile now. I believe Wim is handling the gstreamer stack these days.
"""

I suggested he reassigned his packages but haven't heard back since last
Friday, so I suppose we might have to just go ahead with the
non-responsive process, but likely for all of his packages.

Best regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux