On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:14 AM Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 9:36:01 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:49:34 PM CET Maxwell G wrote: > > > On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 8:22:55 AM CST Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > > On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > >> So it seems that fedpkg doesn't (yet) know there's ~/.config/mock* at all. > > > > > > > > > > Proposed fix: https://pagure.io/rpkg/pull-request/595 > > > > > > > > It seems that this would only fix the issue if the symbolic link has already > > > been created. But before that, `fedpkg --release epel8 mockbuild` would still > > > > fail, wouldn't it? Can we fix that as well, even if it's fixed in some > > > > documentation only? > > > > > > Yes, I think `fedpkg --release epel8 mockbuild` should print the same error > > > message mock does when no default has been set, instead of defaulting to a > > > non-functional koji config. > > > > Fedpkg _automatically_ downloads the relevant Koji config ('koji > > mock-config' variant, which is broken for normal users) when mock doesn't > > ship the appropriate config file (it doesn't by default). > > > > @onosek, would it be too bad if we made the Koji config download feature > > opt-in in fedpkg? Something like 'fedpkg mockbuild --use-koji-mock-config'? > > - when used, all local mock configuration is ignored > > - when not used, 'mock -r epel-8-x86_64' even if the config doesn't exist, > > which would automatically trigger the new Mock error message > > I'm trying to propose this: > https://pagure.io/rpkg/pull-request/597 > > $ fedpkg mockbuild > Not downloading already downloaded pspg-5.5.2.tar.gz > > setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1639353600 > Wrote: /tmp/pspg/pspg-5.5.2-1.el8.src.rpm > ERROR: Could not find required config file: /etc/mock/epel-8-x86_64.cfg > ERROR: There are those alternatives: > ERROR: > ERROR: [1] alma+epel-8-x86_64 > ERROR: Use instead: mock -r alma+epel-8-x86_64 --resultdir /tmp/pspg/results_pspg/5.5.2/1.el8 --rebuild /tmp/pspg/pspg-5.5.2-1.el8.src.rpm > ERROR: Builds against AlmaLinux 8 repositories, together with the official EPEL repositories. > ERROR: Project page: https://almalinux.org/ > ERROR: Enable permanently by: > ERROR: $ ln -s /etc/mock/alma+epel-8-x86_64.cfg /home/praiskup/.config/mock/epel-8-x86_64.cfg > ERROR: > ERROR: [2] centos+epel-8-x86_64 > ERROR: Use instead: mock -r centos+epel-8-x86_64 --resultdir /tmp/pspg/results_pspg/5.5.2/1.el8 --rebuild /tmp/pspg/pspg-5.5.2-1.el8.src.rpm > ERROR: Builds against CentOS Linux 8 repositories, together with the official EPEL repositories. > ERROR: This will reach end-of-life in January 2021. > ERROR: Enable permanently by: > ERROR: $ ln -s /etc/mock/centos+epel-8-x86_64.cfg /home/praiskup/.config/mock/epel-8-x86_64.cfg > ERROR: > ERROR: [3] rhel+epel-8-x86_64 > ERROR: Use instead: mock -r rhel+epel-8-x86_64 --resultdir /tmp/pspg/results_pspg/5.5.2/1.el8 --rebuild /tmp/pspg/pspg-5.5.2-1.el8.src.rpm > ERROR: Builds against Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 repositories, together with the official EPEL repositories. > ERROR: This mimics what is done in the official EPEL build system, but you need a Red Hat subscription: > ERROR: https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/Feature-rhelchroots > ERROR: Enable permanently by: > ERROR: $ ln -s /etc/mock/rhel+epel-8-x86_64.cfg /home/praiskup/.config/mock/epel-8-x86_64.cfg > ERROR: > ERROR: [4] rocky+epel-8-x86_64 > ERROR: Use instead: mock -r rocky+epel-8-x86_64 --resultdir /tmp/pspg/results_pspg/5.5.2/1.el8 --rebuild /tmp/pspg/pspg-5.5.2-1.el8.src.rpm > ERROR: Builds against Rocky Linux 8 repositories, together with the official EPEL repositories. > ERROR: Project page: https://rockylinux.org/ > ERROR: Enable permanently by: > ERROR: $ ln -s /etc/mock/rocky+epel-8-x86_64.cfg /home/praiskup/.config/mock/epel-8-x86_64.cfg > Could not execute mockbuild: Failed to execute command. > This is why I suggested that fedpkg needed the alias system instead of mock in the EPEL discussion. fedpkg already has a config file format for setting keys and values, so fedpkg should be extended to allow people to set the distro prefix to search for with epel targets (e.g. alma, rhel, centos-stream, etc.). Mock is basically the "dumb builder" whereas fedpkg is the high-level packager Swiss Army Knife tool to get stuff done. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
