Re: Packaging pgAdmin4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, 16 December 2021 23:59:23 CET Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 12/10/21 6:56 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>> On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> >>>> On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>>>> This does not appear to be accurate for nodejs packages - take i.e.
> >>>>> node-svgo, which compliant with the guidelines bundles node_modules
> >>>>> dir in svgo-2.8.0-nm-dev.tgz resp svgo-2.8.0-nm-prod.tgz.
> >>>> 
> >>>> You can vendor only sources. No prebuilt assets are allowed.
> >>> 
> >>> Which would basically mean bundling the node_modules folder?
> >> 
> >> No, it would mean bundling the source from which the stuff in
> >> node_modules is generated.
> > 
> > Well this isn't what is the current nodejs packaging guidelines state
> > and as noted by Ben elsewhere in this thread would make it prohibitive
> > to package anything but the most trivial nodejs library.
> 
> If some of the dependencies are unnecessary, the package maintainers
> could patch the code to not use them, and send the patches upstream.
> That said, this really needs to be solved at the NPM level, by having
> NPM packages include machine-extractable source code.
> 
> In any case, node_modules is not source code, since it is not “the
> preferred form of the work for making modifications to it.” (quoting
> LGPLv2.1 here, but I believe Fedora uses an equivalent definition).
> The question then becomes whether it is more like bundling a prebuilt
> binary, which is not acceptable, or like the bundling of the output
> of lex, yacc, or pandoc in autotools-generated tarballs, which I
> consider fine.  One distinction might be whether the output files are
> portable and can be automatically regenerated, which is invariably
> true in the latter case.

I don't see a problem if the node modules don't ship prebuilt libraries or 
binaries. If you look at my scripts they remove all of this.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-bash-language-server/blob/rawhide/f/
prepare_vendor.sh#_55

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux