On Sunday, December 19, 2021 4:55:28 PM CET Maxwell G via devel wrote: > On Thursday, December 16, 2021 12:25:12 PM CST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. See the full > > release notes [1]. The major change that happened is the removal of > > 'epel-8' config files, as a follow-up for [2] discussion (and of course on > > *devel lists, big thanks to everyone for the discussion). > > > > Note that this is is the last v2 release being shipped to all supported > > Fedora/EPEL versions. From now on, we'll move to v3 with development (in > > 'main' branch) and EPEL 7 stays on v2 (in 'mock-2' branch, bugfix only). > > > > [1] https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/Release-Notes-2.16 > > [2] https://pagure.io/epel/issue/133 > > [Fedora 35]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a7d4aaa6fe > > [Fedora 34]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0947974f0a > > [EPEL 8]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2d0f959e00 > > [EPEL 7]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-82ccb8f2b7 > > > > Happy building! > > Pavel > > I have tested this update and found a couple problems. Please see my comment on the Fedora 35 update page (linked above) or see below: > > > Hi @praiskup et. al, > > > > There are a couple problems: > > > > - `fedpkg --release epel8 mockbuild ` does not work properly. It defaults to > > rhel8, which does not work by default and results in a 403 error when > > dnf/mock attempts to install packages. After running `ln -s > > /etc/mock/alma+epel-8-x86 Mock doesn't default to RHEL, there must be some other problem. I quickly tried running that command, and fedpkg seems to create some temporary configuration directory and defaults to building from Koji repos (aka `--enablerepo local`?). Thank you for the report though, I will take a look. ATM I'm curious if this is a bug in Mock ... > _64.cfg ~/.config/mock/epel-8-x86_64.cfg`, it breaks entirely: > > > > ``` > > $ fedpkg --release epel8 mockbuild --no-cleanup-after > > Not downloading already downloaded ansible-core-2.12.1.tar.gz > > > > setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1638921600 > > Wrote: /home/gotmax/Sync/git-repos/packaging/fedora_rpms/forks.repos/ansible.repos/ansible-core/ansible-core-2.12.1-2.el8.src.rpm > > > > mockbuild.exception.ConfigError: Could not find included config file: /tmp/epel-8-x86_64.v230b0w7mockconfig/templates/almalinux-8.tpl > > > > ERROR: Error in configuration > > Could not execute mockbuild: Failed to execute command. > > ``` > > > > It is possible to override the buildroot with `--root alma+epel-8-x86_64`, but that is cumbersome and shouldn't be necessary. > > > > - Using `alma+epel-8-x86_64` works with `mock` itself and with `fedpkg` after applying the aforementioned fix, but mock/dnf repeatedly prints out the following error when installing packages: `Invalid configuration value: failoverm > ethod=priority in /var/lib/mock/alma+epel-8-x86_64/root/etc/dnf/dnf.conf; Configuration: OptionBinding with id "failovermethod" does not exist`. This is an innocent warning, new DNF will not pollute the stderr: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/pull/1276 > > - Even if I wanted to use the `rhel+epel-8-*` configs, they don't work at > > all, as `subscription-manager` is broken (rhbz#1995465) and it is impossible > > to obtain an entitlement. This is unfortunate, I hope we can get an update soon. > > In my opinion, this update should not be pushed until these crucial issues are fixed. This all looks like the same issue. There's no "RHEL default", same as no "Alma default". According to the previous discussion. Thanks again, Pavel > > Thanks, > > > > Maxwell > > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
