On Thursday, December 16, 2021 6:07:10 PM CET Jeremy Newton wrote: > Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD. > To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my > interest and use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to > keep it that way. > There has been a recent effort to step up Debian packaging of ROCm, and > would like to see if anyone has some interest in expanding the Fedora ROCm > packages. > I see there's a few packages already, and I'm hoping to help with some > internal processes to make ROCm more distro friendly, such as better FHS > compliance, clearer licensing, etc. Anyone interested? I would be happy to > try to help or review package requests :) Hi Jeremy, some time ago I tried to start this. The first step would be to cleanup cmake to actually install them correctly and find the dependencies in the system. I've started with this but for some libraries it worked for other it took ages. See e.g. my PRs here: https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCT-Thunk-Interface/pulls? q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed With every new release there are other strange defaults like building libraries as static by default: https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCT-Thunk-Interface/blob/master/ CMakeLists.txt#L37 So before starting with packaging, cmake should be cleaned up: https://cliutils.gitlab.io/modern-cmake/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
