On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:37:16AM -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 12/16/21 09:07, Jeremy Newton wrote: > > Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD. > > To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my interest and use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to keep it that way. > > > > There has been a recent effort to step up Debian packaging of ROCm, and would like to see if anyone has some interest in expanding the Fedora ROCm packages. > > > > I see there's a few packages already, and I'm hoping to help with some internal processes to make ROCm more distro friendly, such as better FHS compliance, clearer licensing, etc. > > Anyone interested? I would be happy to try to help or review package requests :) > > Would you be interested in maintaining the existing packages? I could use > some help keeping them up-to-date with the latest versions. > I'm also interested in helping package more of ROCm, but ideally everyone interested in this should co-maintain. Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keyoxide.org/michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
