Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yeah I think the technical leads are mostly on board with following FHS as close as possible, which is an obvious plus for Fedora.

I think the biggest issue is the scale of the problem, and it almost feel likes they need to work component by component, but [2] will definitely be fixed for all components once they're done assessing everything.

I think the thing I've been advocating for is to use GNUInstallDirs [4] as much as possible, which works really well with Fedora's cmake macros and other distro scripts.

If you have any other complaints, please let me know, and I can try to advocate for them. Unfortunately I work on the graphics side, so I'm not well versed in the ROCm github and the known issues.

[2] https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/rocm_smi_lib/issues/84
[4] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/module/GNUInstallDirs.html
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux