On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 11:47 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:43:58AM -0400, Malita, Florin wrote:
> > I've recently benchmarked the FC4 kernel (2.6.11-1.1369_FC4) against
> > vanilla 2.6.11.12 using UnixBench.
>
> Which is an apples to oranges comparison. 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 is
> actually based on 2.6.12rc6. I'll be interested in seeing results
> rerun against this kernel.
Dave, I still wish that FC would revert to the FC3 src.rpm structure
where the spec provided for a source rpm build. I suspect that the
number of users who wish to customize their kernel is growing and the
FC3 method seems much simpler (at least to me).
BTW, vanilla 2.6.12 (anecdotally) provides seemingly far superior ftp,
http, rsync download speeds in contrast to the distro kernel.
--
* Eliminate Spam: http://www.TQMcube.com/spam_trap.htm
* RBLDNSD HowTo: http://www.TQMcube.com/rbldnsd.htm
* Multi-RBL Check: http://www.TQMcube.com/rblcheck.htm
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
