On 12/3/21 19:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:06:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/2OCCFIKT7LZ7IPO3OKIEH3TDTGERSORM/ Would adding automatically generated obsoletes to 3624 Python packages have any observable negative impact (e.g. on the repodata size or time to resolve deps)?I think that would increase the size of the primary repodata... I guess by number * length of obsolete, so might not be that bad? It would likely affect dnf processing time as well, but not sure how much. It seems like something to try and avoid if possible. kevin
Hi,
point taken. I've checked with the dnf team as well, and they're
of the same opinion. So we won't be turning on the automatic
Obsoletes in Fedora, only in ELN.
Thanks for the feedback!
Tomáš
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
