Re: The great Mailman 3 / Hyperkitty upgrade: bumping flufl-lock and mistune?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14. 12. 21 23:29, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi all,

Neal Gompa and I have been reviving the effort to get our mailing list
server infrastructure (currently running on RHEL 7 with missing packages
provided in an unofficial repo) hostable on RHEL 9 + EPEL.

Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
Bugzilla tracker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030061
Status: https://hackmd.io/Pb9otlVGQHe1r9BIC5bi7w (not fully updated yet)

We're currently stuck on the following:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032607

Your package (python-hyperkitty) Fails To Install in Fedora 36:

can't install hyperkitty:
   - nothing provides python3.10dist(flufl-lock) >= 4 needed by hyperkitty-1.3.5-1.fc36.noarch
   - nothing provides python3.10dist(mistune) >= 2~rc1 needed by hyperkitty-1.3.5-1.fc36.noarch

I have PRs attached to the upgrade requests for mistune: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782288
and flufl-lock: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852603

but both have breaking changes I detailed in the above Bz entries; if
you're a maintainer cc:ed on this email please check the relevant bz:

...

❯ sudo dnf repoquery --enablerepo=fedora-source,rawhide,rawhide-source --whatrequires python3-mistune
python-m2r-0:0.2.1-5.20190604git66f4a5a.fc35.src
python-nbconvert-0:6.1.0-2.fc35.src
python-nbconvert-0:6.1.0-3.fc36.src
python3-m2r-0:0.2.1-5.20190604git66f4a5a.fc35.noarch
python3-nbconvert-0:6.1.0-2.fc35.noarch
python3-nbconvert-0:6.1.0-3.fc36.noarch

In particular, python-nbconvert specifically requires mistune < 2, and
upstream doesn't seem to have a newer release yet.

This is the biggest blocker. If nbconvert figures it out in git, we can backport it. Until then, I would not merge the update. If we really need this ASAP, we can introduce python-mistune0.8 compat pacakge.


PRs:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flufl-lock/pull-request/1
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-mistune/pull-request/5

...

We should probably bump the packages in Rawhide anyway

No, please don't yet.

, but also to
note:
- both of these packages are not co-maintained by the Python SIG

mistune is.

- most of the recent updates have been done by non-maintainers

For mistune, it was by Python SIG members.

Would it make sense to get the following groups officially added to the
package ACLs?
- infra-sig (admin), to ease maintaining the dependencies for Mailman
   and Hyperkitty

Python SIG is very responsive to pull requests, so I don't think adding another SIG makes the "ease of maintaining" significantly better.

- python-sig (commit or admin), for fixing issues e.g. with newer Python
   versions

Already there.

- epel-packagers-sig (collaborator, epel* branches) for helping to
   bootstrap on new EL releases

Fine by me, although I prefer actual maintainers to be responsible for EPEL branches.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux