On 12/14/21 12:37, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > A sosreport contains a tonne of useful info, but for any single bug > the vast majority is irrelevant. So it is much harder to argue that > requesting this sos report info is proportionate for solving bugs > from Fedora users, especially when attachments default to public > and never expire. I'm happy if Fedora SOS reports default to *less* information, and perhaps have no logs, and if that gets us under the 19.5MiB attachment limit then I'm fine. I'm looking for an *easy* way to get /proc/cpuinfo and other system information from a developer since that helps me as a glibc developer track down bugs. The existence of sos makes this process easier (no matter if it gathers too much information). I have not seen any Fedora-specific customization for sos (the package e.g. sos.spec) but it should be possible to do that. I could file a bug asking for a Fedora-specific customization to default to collecting less information? -- Cheers, Carlos. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
