On 09. 12. 21 18:34, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:57 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
The only way I can think of to "ignore" pre-releases is to add a
"Version filter" on release-monitoring.org ...
I've started adding a "alpha;beta;rc;pre" filter (and set the
versioning to "semantic" to make sure they are sorted correctly) to
all Rust packages I touch, because we don't package pre-releases
except in rare circumstances.
Buuuut that only prevents anitya from fetching *new* pre-releases that
match that filter, it doesn't remove those that are already in the
database, and you won't get notifications for "new" versions that are
"older" than the latest pre-release :(
Do you have an example? Because this is a bug. If the project doesn't
have some strange versioning scheme the stable should be still
considered newer than pre-release and the message should be emitted and
processed by The New Hotness.
Michal
Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
