On 12/10/21 08:15, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 10.12.21 um 15:13 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
Some other replies in this thread assumed that the programs will crash.
I have no idea why you would assume that.
If properly implemented, such programs typically won't crash, they will
"just not work" oder "error out".
Functionally, dlopening libraries, instead of dynamically linking really
does not provide any advantages.
Maybe you need to read the other messages in the thread again. It's the
difference between crashing or gracefully reducing functionality while
avoiding hard dependencies.
We're not complete idiots.With all due respect, tt's not the first
time systemd communicates the
attitude of blindly imitating MS-Windows. Whether you like it or not,
this appears to be one of these cases.
There's no need to be rude and you aren't being respectful. This has
nothing to do with Windows. I don't even understand what that
comparison is supposed to mean in this context.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
