Re: Packaging pgAdmin4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10.12.21 22:05, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:57 PM Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 10.12.21 01:54, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 12/9/21 1:05 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.12.21 17:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 09/12/2021 16:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
This does not appear to be accurate for nodejs packages - take i.e.
node-svgo, which compliant with the guidelines bundles node_modules
dir in svgo-2.8.0-nm-dev.tgz resp svgo-2.8.0-nm-prod.tgz.
You can vendor only sources. No prebuilt assets are allowed.
Which would basically mean bundling the node_modules folder?
No, it would mean bundling the source from which the stuff in
node_modules is generated.
Well this isn't what is the current nodejs packaging guidelines state
and as noted by Ben elsewhere in this thread would make it prohibitive
to package anything but the most trivial nodejs library.
Well, not even NodeJS packaging can ignore basic "legal" requirements
(such as: not shipping pre-built binaries etc.).
I always assumed that to be an implicit rule, which doesn't need to be
repeated on every domain-specific Packaging Guidelines page ...
So, if bundled / vendored dependencies contain objectionable content,
those files needs to be removed, preferably before building the vendor
tarball.
If that's currently not the case, then NodeJS packaging is more broken
than I thought.

The license review is outlined in [1] and not the issue at hand here - clearly, bundled content needs to satisfy the licensing requirements or otherwise removed. The issue here concerns bundling node_modules vs unbundling and building from source every single dependency and dependency of dependency.

Thanks
Sandro


[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Node.js/#_bundled_licenses
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux