On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 10:43, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:21:34AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Full report available at: > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-12-06.txt > > grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. > > Could we get rid of the limit > > "Too many dependencies for wsdl4j, not all listed here" > > in the long reports? I don't really care how big that text file is in > my browser. > > > For human readable dependency chains, > > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ > > For all orphaned packages, > > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan > > This is nicer, not sure if I've seen this before. > > Looks like the main breakage is: > > mingw-nsis -> scons -> fop -> tomcat -> wsdl4j > > That gets increasingly weird. NSIS is an installer builder for > Windows (fine), scons is a Python-based build system (also fine), > fop is a documentation formatting tool, tomcat is an application > server (!) > > So I wonder why a Python-based build system relies on a Java-based > application server. > Well, for whatever reason, upstream fop contains a servlet implementation (which requires an app server) but we don't even build or ship this servlet in our fop package. I removed an unnecessary BR on 'servlet' from the fop package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fop/c/fba0361894999fbf17c8672e96d4dc95cc06314f?branch=rawhide Does that add more sanity to the dep chain? -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure