Re: rpm bug for multiple README.md or LICENSE.md in EPEL 8 and Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Aarggh, I had a cat attacking my hands at one moment. I meant:

          /usr/share/doc/%}package}-%{version}/README.md
          /usr/share/doc/%{package}-%{version}/LICENSE.md

On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 10:07 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've been trying to bundle the current ansible-5.0.1 release as an RPM
> for Fedora and EPEL use. Leaving aside the peculiar decisions to
> replace the pypi.org "ansible" tarball with a tarball of roughly 150
> modules from the "ansiblee-collections" repos, and moving the actual
> ansible software to a distinct python tarball called "ansible-core"
> without changing the source repo or the actual critical installed
> python modules, the new "ansible" has more than 300 files called
> "README.md" and more than 100 files called "LICENSE.md".
>
> This breaks building RPMs for EPEL 8 or Fedora, because the '%doc' and
> '%license' macros strip off the subdirectories of the files and
> install them directly at the top of the docdir.
>
> Basicely these only generate one file:
>
>        %doc README.md
>        %doc dir1/README.md
>        %doc dir2/README.md
>
>        %license LICENSE.md
>         %license dir1/LICENSE
>         %license dir2/LICENSE.md
>
> When compiled, these would only produce:
>
>           /usr/share/doc/package-%{fersion}/README.md
>           /usr/share/doc/package-%{fersion}/LICENSE.md
>
> RHEL 7 didn't have this problem. I'm not sure if other folks have
> noticed this for tools that are built with multiple internal tarballs.
> The new "ansible" tarball is fairly unique ints authors insistance on
> putting more than one hundred distinct third party packages in the
> same master tarball. But for now, this is going to cause a license and
> documentation problem in packaging it due to an "optimization" of
> stripping out the directory names of document files and licenses.
>
> Does anyone know a decent workaround, or a specfile setting to disable
> this filename stripping and restore the RHEL 7 behavior?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux