Re: jpegxl soname bump

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le ven. 3 déc. 2021 à 17:17, Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 15:36 +0000, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > F35 updates has libaom-3.2.0-2 and libjxl-0.6.1-6 already - so did
> > the buildroot go through?
> > (This conflicts with heif from rpmfusion, which I can't complain
> > about here, of course.)
>
> yes , buildroot go through , rpmfusion packages are fixed just need to
> be published in repos
Problem was not only about rpmfusion packages rebuilt, but also a lot
of missing fedora rebuilt.
To this date, there are still missing rebuilds, so was my -1 for this update.

@besser Can you clarify why you have pushed this update to stable
despite my notice ?
This is not the first time this problem occurs with aom and some
fedora rebuilds are not done.

Someone will have to fix the missing piece...
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux