Re: Shouldn't Fedora 36/rawhide kernel be 5.17 not 5.16 rc3 git?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reon Beon via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I see mine crashing reasonably often in Problem Reporting. Any
> packages I should install?
>
> "The backtrace does not contain enough meaningful function frames to
> be reported. It is annoying but it does not necessarily indicate a
> problem with your computer. ABRT will not allow you to create a report
> in a bug tracking system but you can contact kernel maintainers via
> e-mail."

These days, many debugging tools can automatically fetch debuginfo from
fedora servers (https://debuginfod.fedoraproject.org/).  Do you know
which abrt processing tool was complaining to you - like based on which
dead program's backtrace?

If that can't work for this tool just now, you can probably do this:
# debuginfo-install kernel

- FChE
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux