Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Mock/Copr default epel-8-* configuration to be changed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:04 AM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:00:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > If Fedora and EPEL were to have older versions, we'd have to have a
> > dedicated CDN endpoint for them, because mirrors would seriously have
> > trouble taking it.
>
> How often would such packages be used? If we had a non-default repo
> available but not enabled by default, it could be optional to mirror and
> probably still be okay.
>

I suspect it would be fairly heavily used. There are significant
benefits to having those:

* DeltaRPM would be considerably more useful
* "dnf history undo" would actually work

We could make it non-default and tell people that rollbacks require an
--enablerepo= option, though.

Having its own mirror module would also give mirrors the ability to
opt in, and I wouldn't be surprised if a good chunk of them do.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux