On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 11:34 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 14:46 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > > Am I the only one that it kind of bothers to not see java stuff using a > > dedicated namespace for the package names? Things like "gnu.regexp" seem > > totally wrong... not to mention the dot in the name for that particular > > one. No you're not alone in that Matthias... > > If you want, bring this up with the JPackage folk since that's where the > names are coming from. Since when did FC start to follow whatever somebody else does? It's not any different for java, "gnu.regexp" is simply a bad name for a java-only library (or whatever they're called in the java-land). Just imagine all the perl-modules in FC without perl-prefix: - XML-SAX - TimeDate - HTML-Parser ... etc. I think you get the idea. - Panu - -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
